Why This Search Exists

Teams often share browser tasks informally, which leads to inconsistent execution and unclear boundaries around hosting and local execution.

That makes browser operations harder to maintain as more teams adopt the same workflows.

Recommended Approach

Adapter design gives repeated tasks stable names, arguments, and execution mode. That makes cross-team reuse practical and lowers operational ambiguity.

iatlas-browser already provides a site adapter model that fits this approach.

Key Takeaways

  • Reusable browser commands scale better than copied scripts.
  • Execution boundaries should be explicit in adapter design.
  • Hosted adapters are for public remote-safe work.
  • Stateful adapters should stay local.

Fast Start

  1. Collect the repeated browser tasks used across teams.
  2. Normalize the task names and argument shapes.
  3. Decide which commands are hosted-safe and which are local-only.
  4. Publish and document the catalog accordingly.

Next Action

Browse adapters

Move from research to implementation by choosing the correct boundary: local runtime for real-session work, hosted API for public-safe retrieval.